AdvertiseDonate
Wednesday, November 11, 2026Local news for Denver and Colorado.
Denver Metro Herald · 1512 Larimer Street, Denver, CO 80202

New Castle Man Receives Call After AT&T Settles $5,128 Scam Bill

A 50-year customer lost four phones to a fake loyalty offer before a consumer advocate intervened.

By Diego Mendoza ·

Illustration for: New Castle Man Receives Call After AT&T Settles $5,128 Scam Bill
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

AT&T has agreed to reverse a $5,128 bill for David Miller, a New Castle, Delaware, resident who purchased four iPhone Pro Max devices after receiving a suspicious loyalty offer. The carrier confirmed the settlement to Miller on the day after the In Your Corner consumer advocacy group contacted the company on his behalf. A representative from the Office of the President and Consumer Affairs called Miller to inform him that the company would not hold him responsible for the charges and would refund any fees he had incurred.

Miller, who has been an AT&T customer for more than 50 years, initially believed the offer was a reward for his long-term service. The caller claimed to be from the company's loyalty department and offered four new iPhones along with a lower monthly bill. Miller followed the instructions and bought the four devices, which cost approximately $1,200 each. He was told to bring the phones home and call back for activation. The first bill alone would have exceeded $900 for the devices he no longer possessed.

The situation changed when a second caller, claiming to be from the company's IT department, contacted Miller on FaceTime. This individual asked to see the backs of the phone boxes to activate the devices. After stating there was a problem with the activation, the caller instructed Miller to ship the phones back using a prepaid label. The caller promised replacement phones would arrive the next day. Miller recalled a specific instruction that raised his suspicion: the caller told him not to tell the people at the store that the loyalty department was providing the phones.

The caller contacted Miller repeatedly for an entire week, sometimes several times a day. Miller realized the deal was a scam when the promised replacements never arrived. He said he immediately contacted AT&T's fraud department, filed reports with UPS and local police, and reached out to consumer protection agencies. Despite these steps, the company initially told him he was responsible for the charges because he had authorized the purchases himself. Miller described his reaction as devastation when he saw the final bill amount.

Miller noted that the caller ID on his phone displayed AT&T every time the number rang, which helped convince him the call was legitimate. The Federal Trade Commission reports that fraud schemes in which criminals pose as trusted companies are among the most commonly reported in the United States, resulting in billions of dollars in losses annually. A key tactic in these scams is caller ID spoofing, which allows fraudsters to make calls appear to come from legitimate businesses. Miller said this spoofing was the primary factor that convinced him to proceed with the purchase.

Miller contacted the In Your Corner program after feeling out of options. The group reviewed his case and reached out to AT&T. The next day, the company's high-level representative called to confirm the resolution. Miller joked that the resolution saved his marriage, noting that his wife had begun unpacking her bags in preparation for a potential separation. He hopes sharing his experience will help others avoid similar traps. He advised that if an offer sounds too good to be true, it probably is, and if a caller rushes a decision, it is likely not a good idea.

Consumer advocates recommend that customers hang up on unexpected offers and contact the company directly using the phone number listed on a bill or official website. Scammers can spoof virtually any phone number to appear legitimate. Miller’s case illustrates how a familiar tactic can deceive even long-term loyal customers when the caller ID matches the expected business name. The resolution stands as a specific outcome for Miller, with the charges reversed and the phones returned to his possession.

More News · Denver news · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Denver Metro Herald in your inboxLocal news for Denver and Colorado. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Get Denver Metro Herald in your inboxLocal news for Denver and Colorado. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.